Review workflow

See how a request moves from intake to delivery start.

The process keeps the request, capability fit, governance questions, commercial structure, and implementation handoff in one visible thread.

Submit procurement Browse solutions

Six-stage timeline

Each stage answers a different buyer question.

The timeline shows what gets validated before the program moves deeper into delivery planning.

01
Intake validation
Confirm the request belongs on the procurement route and has enough buyer context to move forward.
02
Capability and scope qualification
Match the problem to the right capability track and identify the main scope questions early.
03
Scope architecture and delivery model alignment
Translate the qualified scope into a realistic delivery shape and rollout posture.
04
Governance, risk, and evaluation alignment
Make the review requirements visible enough for procurement, technical, and operating stakeholders.
05
Commercial structure and staged decision support
Shape commercial discussion around the real program path instead of forcing a single rigid format.
06
Implementation start and operating handoff
Move from procurement into kickoff with the minimum possible reset.

Stage detail

Open the stage that matches the current blocker.

The detail is intentionally split so teams can check the relevant stage without rereading the whole workflow.

Intake validation

Confirm the request belongs on the procurement route and has enough buyer context to move forward.

Check buyer type, review path, and whether the request is software-led.
Confirm the submission pack has enough scope and timing to avoid a noisy first cycle.
Return obvious gaps before the team spends time on the wrong route.

Capability and scope qualification

Match the problem to the right capability track and identify the main scope questions early.

Check whether the request fits custom software, AI, digital product, modernization, or hybrid delivery.
Clarify user groups, workflow complexity, and the likely operating burden.
Flag missing information that blocks serious qualification.

Scope architecture and delivery model alignment

Translate the qualified scope into a realistic delivery shape and rollout posture.

Frame the program around workflows, integrations, constraints, and rollout logic.
Decide whether the safer path is new build, modernization, pilot, phased rollout, or hybrid implementation.
Keep the technical story and delivery story aligned before governance review expands.

Governance, risk, and evaluation alignment

Make the review requirements visible enough for procurement, technical, and operating stakeholders.

Surface controls, data handling, approvals, and reporting obligations.
Tie evaluation support to the actual scope instead of generic vendor language.
Keep ownership and review expectations visible before commercial structure hardens.

Commercial structure and staged decision support

Shape commercial discussion around the real program path instead of forcing a single rigid format.

Support phased decisions, pilots, staged expansion, or broader rollout where needed.
Prepare the material buyers need for internal approval and commercial confidence.
Keep staging, capability, and governance in one thread while decisions are made.

Implementation start and operating handoff

Move from procurement into kickoff with the minimum possible reset.

Carry forward delivery assumptions, ownership boundaries, and support expectations.
Confirm the first implementation stage, rollout order, and operating handoff.
Make sure the approved program still feels like the one that was reviewed.

What buyers usually have ready

A strong intake package makes the first review useful.

These signals help the team validate route fit before commercial structure, governance, or rollout decisions become noisy.

Buyer prep	What should already be clear	Artifact that helps	Why it matters in review
Scope frame	What outcome needs to change, who uses it, and which capability route looks most likely.	Scope brief, RFP summary, or internal problem statement.	Stops the first review from drifting into vague vendor language.
Operational context	Main workflows, dependencies, and the environment where the program has to operate.	Workflow map, current-state notes, or service/process diagram.	Keeps capability fit, governance, and rollout in the same conversation.
Review posture	Stakeholders, timing pressure, and which approval concerns will appear first.	Evaluation criteria, decision memo, or internal review outline.	Makes buyer pressure visible before procurement teams lose time on the wrong route.
Delivery shape	Whether the safer start is discovery, pilot, phased rollout, or managed support.	Timeline, milestone plan, or phased decision note.	Shows how the program can start cautiously without resetting the route later.

Program staging

The process can start cautiously and still support expansion.

Discovery, pilot, phased rollout, and managed support stay legible inside one delivery path rather than becoming separate restarts.

Discovery

Confirm the problem, users, constraints, and delivery shape before a wider commitment.

Pilot

Validate the route with a controlled first implementation when the buyer needs evidence.

Rollout

Phased rollout

Expand by workflow, team, geography, or environment without rebuilding the scope story.

Support

Managed support

Carry the program into stabilization, support, and ongoing operational improvement.

Continue

Resolve the blocker, then move to the next route.

If workflow is clear, return to the browser or submit. If buyer pressure or environment risk is still unresolved, use those pages before intake.

Browse solutions Submit procurement